MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054706604 · doi:10.1118/1.4740188

Sci—Fri AM: Imaging — 02: High resolution detectors for PET mammography

2012· article· en· W2054706604 on OpenAlexaff
SG Cuddy, J. A. Rowlands

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityThunder Bay Regional Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilicon photomultiplierLyso-ScintillationDetectorOpticsScintillatorPhysicsPhotodetectorBreast imagingPhotonPhotomultiplierOptoelectronicsMammographyMedicineBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: With high specificity for malignant breast lesions, dedicated-breast molecular imaging systems such as positron emission mammography (PEM) have potential to improve the sensitivity of cancer in women with radio-dense breasts and to reduce the false-positive rate of breast screening when used as a diagnostic adjunct. For high signal-to-noise ratio and to minimize the patient dose, scintillation detectors in a PEM system must have high annihilation photon detection efficiency. This efficiency can be increased by accepting annihilation photons from wider incident angles and by using depth-of-interaction (DOI) measurement within a scintillation crystal to minimize parallax blurring. We have developed a dual-ended readout block (DERB) detector that uses asymmetry of signals from photodetectors on either end of a scintillation array to measure DOI and uses Anger Logic with light sharing to identify interacting crystal elements while minimizing the number of photodetectors required. METHODS: A prototype DERB detector was constructed from two arrays of silicon photomultipliers (SiPM), two glass optical diffusers, and an array of LYSO scintillation crystals. Assembled, each of the 2 × 2 SiPM arrays detect photons that are dispersed via the optical light diffusers originating from either end of 3 × 3 scintillation crystal elements. We evaluated the ability of the detector to identify the crystal index, resolve DOI, and discriminate energy. RESULTS: The DERB detector was able to clearly identify interacting crystal elements, to measure DOI with ̃5mm resolution in 2mm × 2mm × 20mm crystals, and to achieve an average energy resolution of ̃20%. CONCLUSIONS: The DERB detector characteristics suggest that it can be used to reduce the parallax effect in PEM systems without increasing the number of required photodetectors. Further investigation is warranted to improve performance with high optical photon detection efficiency photodetectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207