MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054735502 · doi:10.1021/om020820f

Spectroscopic and Computational Assessment of the Rotational Barrier of a Ferrocenyl-Stabilized Cyclopentadienyl Cation:  Evidence for the First Hydroxyfulvalene Ligand

2003· article· en· W2054735502 on OpenAlexaff
L.E. Harrington, Ignacio Vargas‐Baca, N. Reginato, Michael J. McGlinchey

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Reactions and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryProtonationCyclopentadienyl complexTrifluoroacetic acidLigand (biochemistry)MetalNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyFerroceneRotation (mathematics)Computational chemistryCrystallographyStereochemistryPhysical chemistryIonOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protonation of 3-ferrocenyl-2,4,5-triphenylcyclopentadienone with trifluoroacetic acid results in the formation of the first hydroxyfulvalene complex. The dramatic deshielding and decoalescence of the 1 H and 13 C NMR signals in the ferrocenyl region offer evidence for the participation of the metal in the stabilization of the positive charge, which results in restricted rotation of the ferrocenyl group. As determined by NMR spectroscopy, the maximum barrier to rotation in the neutral species is ca. 9 kcal mol - 1, whereas the minimum barrier in the cation considerably exceeds 13 kcal mol - 1 . The difference in rotational barriers for the neutral and protonated species is rationalized by using DFT calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicChemical Reactions and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207