Acute phase nematode infection reduces resting metabolic rate in both protein-sufficient and protein-deficient mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate whether protein deficiency concurrent with the acute phase of infection with the murine nematode Heligmosomoides bakeri (Durette-Desset, Kinsella and Forrester, 1972; Tenora and Barus, 2001) affected the resting metabolic rate (RMR) in BALB/c mice, and whether deworming caused RMR to return to normal. Mice fed either a protein-sufficient (PS, 24%) or protein-deficient (PD, 3%) diet were infected with 100 larvae, and then treated with an anthelmintic drug on 9 and 14 days postinfection (dpi). RMR was measured on –2, 2, 7, and 19 dpi. The results showed that protein deficiency did not affect RMR at any of these times. RMR was unchanged immediately following infection (2 vs. –2 dpi) at the time when larvae are first embedded in the serosal musculture. Surprisingly, at 7 dpi when larvae migrate from the serosal musculture into the intestinal lumen, RMR was significantly lower in both diet groups compared with earlier time points. This reduced RMR persisted even after deworming. Possible reasons for these results are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".