MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

O Efeito Fabril que o Newsmaking não vê: o que dizem outras áreas do conhecimento sobre os constrangimentos sofridos por jornalistas na Fábrica de Notícias // The Fabril Effect that the Newsmaking does not see: what other areas of knowledge...

2012· article· pt· W2054759352 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDispositiva · 2012
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia and Communication Studies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A notícia faz parte de uma construção social da realidade. Trata-se de um bem capital, fabricável. Existe um mercado noticioso que produz notícias e as comercializada. Se a empresa jornalística pode ser comparada a uma Fábrica de Notícias, com linha de montagem de produção de notícias (Newsmaking), o jornalista seria o operário desse negócio. Em Teorias da Comunicação, estuda-se muito os constragimentos, gratificações e penalidades do trabalho e do sistema organizacional no qual o jornalista está inserido. Mas tal arcabouço teórico não consegue vislumbrar, em termos práticos, situações de doenças, estresse e outros males ao indivíduo. O artigo visa compilar estudos da Psicologia Social, Ciência da Informação e da Comunicação que relatem sobre o sofrimento dos jornalistas neste contexto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it