MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054766319 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2012.6389277

A smart monitor for measurement and fault detection

2012· article· en· W2054766319 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Kadik, Wilson Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBearing (navigation)Fault detection and isolationWaveletFault (geology)Feature extractionEnergy (signal processing)VibrationSIGNAL (programming language)Computer scienceCondition monitoringRotor (electric)Pattern recognition (psychology)Feature (linguistics)Wavelet transformArtificial intelligenceEngineeringElectronic engineeringAcousticsActuatorMathematicsPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A smart monitor is developed in this paper for vibration measurement and signal analysis. The 3D vibration signals can be measured in either an analog or a digital form. This reprogrammable monitor can conduct fault detect in shaft-related systems such as rotor imbalance, misalignment, and bearing defects. An energy spectrum technique is proposed and implemented for bearing fault detection: Firstly bearing resonance signatures are demodulated by wavelet decomposition, and then the resulting wavelet energy functions are integrated to enhance feature characteristics. A correlation spectrum is employed to highlight bearing fault characteristic frequencies. The effectiveness of the proposed techniques is verified by experimental tests corresponding to different bearing conditions. Test results show that the suggested wavelet energy spectrum approach is a robust bearing fault detection technique especially for non-stationary feature extraction and analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207