Diffusion Tensor Metric Measurements as a Function of Diffusion Time in the Rat Central Nervous System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MRI and Monte Carlo simulated data of pulsed gradient spin echo experiments were used to study the effects of diffusion time, gradient strength and b-value on diffusion tensor (DT) metrics using real and simulated fixed rat spines. Radial (λ ⊥ ) in grey matter and simulation data, axial (λ || ) in both grey and white matter in fixed rat spinal cords and mean diffusivity in all tissues showed a significant decrease with diffusion time at b = 1 μm 2 /ms. All diffusivities significantly decreased with b-value at g = 116 mT/m and at Δ eff = 23 ms. The fractional anisotropy (FA) significantly increased with diffusion time at b = 1 μm 2 /ms in the simulation data and grey matter. FA significantly increased in white matter and simulation data and significantly decreased in grey matter with b-value at g = 116 mT/m and at Δ eff = 23 ms. These data suggest that DTI metrics are highly dependent on pulse sequence parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".