Mining statistically sound co-location patterns at multiple distances
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Existing co-location mining algorithms require a user provided distance threshold at which prevalent patterns are searched. Since spatial interactions, in reality, may happen at different distances, finding the right distance threshold to mine all true patterns is not easy and a single appropriate threshold may not even exist. A standard co-location mining algorithm also requires a prevalence measure threshold to find prevalent patterns. The prevalence measure values of the true co-location patterns occurring at different distances may vary and finding a prevalence measure threshold to mine all true patterns without reporting random patterns is not easy and sometimes not even possible. In this paper, we propose an algorithm to mine true co-location patterns at multiple distances. Our approach is based on a statistical test and does not require thresholds for the prevalence measure and the interaction distance. We evaluate the efficacy of our algorithm using synthetic and real data sets comparing it with the state-of-the-art co-location mining approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it