MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054773970 · doi:10.1590/1678-7153.201427208

Avaliação da Qualidade de Vida Infantil: O Inventário Sistémico de Qualidade de Vida para Crianças

2014· article· pt· W2054773970 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsicologia Reflexão e Crítica · 2014
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsNanoQuébec (Canada)Université du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A avaliação da qualidade de vida infantil apresenta especificidades metodológicas. O objetivo do presente estudo é analisar as características psicométricas da versão portuguesa do Inventaire Systémique de Qualité de Vie pour Enfants(ISQV-C), que assenta numa abordagem conceptual e metodológica inovadora para a autoavaliação da qualidade de vida, por ser interativo e lúdico, possuir uma psicometria que explora diversas pontuações e permitir uma análise de cada domínio de vida. Participaram do estudo 120 crianças portuguesas, dos 8 aos 12 anos de idade. Os resultados apontam para uma consistência interna satisfatória das quatro pontuações do ISQV-C (Estado, Objetivo, Importância e Qualidade de Vida), atestam validade convergente ao instrumento, não sendo favoráveis à existência de uma estrutura fatorial. Demonstra-se a adequação psicométrica e o interesse da versão portuguesa do ISQV-C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it