MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054780479 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.141011

Controversial sodium guidelines: Scientific solution or perpetual debate?

2014· article· en· W2054780479 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Stuart MacLeod, John A. Cairns

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSodium Intake and Health
Canadian institutionsChild and Family Research InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMcMaster UniversityHamilton Health Sciences
KeywordsSodiumDietary SodiumMedicineBlood pressureScientific evidenceIntensive care medicineInternal medicineChemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most clinicians accept epidemiologic evidence of a positive association between increased dietary sodium intake and blood pressure, as well as evidence of blood pressure reduction when dietary sodium is decreased.[1][1] In the era of evidence-based medicine, they may also assume that national

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.174
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.430
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.921

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1740.430
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0080.034
Scholarly communication0.0160.023
Open science0.0110.009
Research integrity0.0470.056
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicSodium Intake and HealthFrench-language works237,207