MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054815584 · doi:10.1115/1.1825048

Numerical Modeling of PEM Fuel Cells Under Partially Hydrated Membrane Conditions

2005· article· en· W2054815584 on OpenAlexafffund
Jun Cao, Ned Djilali

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy Resources Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsProton exchange membrane fuel cellChemistryDragThermodynamicsElectrolyteLaplace's equationWater transportConvection–diffusion equationMechanicsDiffusionDiffusion equationCurrent (fluid)Water flowMembranePhysicsPartial differential equationEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In proton-exchange membrane fuel cells it is particularly important to maintain appropriate water content and temperature in the electrolyte membrane. The water balance depends on the coupling between diffusion of water, pressure variation, and the electro-osmotic drag in the membrane. In this paper we apply conservation laws for water and current, in conjunction with an empirical relationship between electro-osmotic drag and water content, to obtain a transport equation for water molar concentration and to derive a new equation for the electric potential that strictly accounts for variable water content and is more accurate than the conventionally used Laplace’s equation. The model is coupled with a computational fluid dynamics model that includes the porous gas diffusion electrodes and the reactant flow channels. The resulting coupled model accounts for multi-species diffusion (Stefan-Maxwell equation); first-order reaction kinetics (Butler-Volmer equation); proton transport (Nernst-Planck equation); and water transport in the membrane (Schlo¨gl equation). Numerical simulations for a two-dimensional cell are performed over nominal current densities ranging from i=0.4 to i=1.2 A/cm2. The relationship between humidification and the membrane potential loss is investigated, and the impact and importance of two-dimensionality, temperature, and pressure nonuniformities are analyzed and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.317
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Energy Resources TechnologySame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207