MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054828263 · doi:10.1037/a0025221

Effects of acute nicotine administration on resting EEG in nonsmokers.

2011· article· en· W2054828263 on OpenAlex
Derek J. Fisher, Richelle Daniels, Natalia Jaworska, Amy Knobelsdorf, Verner Knott

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNicotineNicotine gumPlaceboAnesthesiaMedicineNicotine withdrawalElectroencephalographyArousalPopulationNicotine patchResting state fMRIPsychologyAudiologyInternal medicinePsychiatryNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smoking/nicotine has been shown to increase brain arousal states, yet previous studies have failed to distinguish between absolute improvements due to nicotine versus relief from withdrawal symptoms in smokers. This study examined the electrocortical response to nicotine in a nonsmoking population, in order to negate potential withdrawal symptoms. Twenty right-handed, nonsmoking participants were administered nicotine (6 mg) or placebo gum within a double-blind, repeated-measures design. In each session, EEG was recorded during a 2-min, resting, eyes-open condition. Nicotine administration (vs. placebo) resulted in significantly greater frontal (specifically left-frontal) alpha2 power. Similar to previous findings in smokers. The absence of slow-wave changes following nicotine in nonsmokers suggest that these previous results in smokers may be related to withdrawal state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it