Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 55-year-old married man presented to our service with a 3-year history of erectile dysfunction (ED). Prior to seeing us, he had obtained a prescription from his local general practitioner for four sildenafil (Viagra®) tablets (50 mg) and had found them to be ineffective. Subsequently, he also tried two tadalafil (Cialis®) tablets (20 mg) and vardenafil (Levitra ®[20 mg]) with no improvement in his erection function. His past medical history includes obesity (BMI 32), hypertension (on atenolol), active smoker (20 cigarettes per day) with a 40-pack year history and diabetes (diet-controlled). He reported that he is unable to achieve and maintain his erection in nearly all circumstances on all occasions with his wife, whom he describes as supportive. He denied previous penile trauma or any deformity, and believes that his erections have become progressively less rigid over the past 3 years. He denied any sensory changes on the shaft or glans. His sexual interest remains strong but even with self-stimulation he is unable to gain adequate rigidity, but reported that his ejaculation and orgasm remain intact.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".