MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054847536 · doi:10.1353/ces.2014.0007

The Status of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Canada

2014· article· fr· W2054847536 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Lloyd Sciban

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraditional medicineGeographyHistoryEthnologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente à quel point la Médecine traditionnelle chinoise (MTC) a bien sa place au Canada. On peut voir comment elle fait partie des tendances et à quel point elle est largement institutionalisée. Les Canadiens font de plus en plus appel à la médecine alternative. De plus, la MTC est une forme importante de traitement dans divers hôpitaux, elle est considérablement commercialisée, elle est couverte par plusieurs plans d’assurance santé, elle est soumise aux régulations imposées par le gouvernement de quatre provinces et par le fédéral, elle a ses propres agences de réglementation et établissements d’enseignement, et on en donne des cours dans le système public d’éducation. Sa présence va sans doute s’étendre du fait que cette institutionalisation continue de mettre l’accent sur les valeurs fondamentales de la MTC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian ethnic studiesSame topicComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207