MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An investigation of the substrate preference of white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) eleutheroembryos

2007· article· en· W2054858041 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Ichthyology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsVancouver Island University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSturgeonBiologySubstrate (aquarium)Quadrant (abdomen)FisheryWhite (mutation)AcipenserFish <Actinopterygii>ZoologyAnimal scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fifty white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) eleutheroembryos (average size 0.17 g) were placed onto each of four quadrants (0.45 m2 quadrant−1; 200 fish tank−1) of different sized substrates in four circular tanks (approximately 562 L). Each of three quadrants had a different size substrate and the fourth quadrant was left bare. We used one replicate of smaller size substrates (0.5–11.9 mm) and one replicate of larger size substrates (21.7–88 mm). It was found that the white sturgeon eleutheroembryos preferred substrate with an average size (longest diameter) of 12 mm (11.9) in the smaller substrate range and 22 mm (21.7) in the larger substrate range. These data improve our knowledge of white sturgeon early life history, and if confirmed in the wild can be used to protect areas that are crucial for white sturgeon recruitment and survival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it