Stability of elemental signatures in the scales of spawning weakfish, <i>Cynoscion regalis</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We quantified elemental signatures in scales of ages-1 and -2 weakfish, Cynoscion regalis, collected during the spawning season in Pamlico Sound, Chesapeake Bay, and Delaware Bay in 1998. We compared these signatures with elemental signatures from scales of juvenile weakfish collected while still resident in natal estuaries at five locations along the Atlantic coast in 1996 and 1997. Although Mg/Ca and Mn/Ca were lower in the juvenile portion of scales from adults compared with scales from juvenile fish, Sr/Ca and Ba/Ca were similar in the three age groups. We compared scale and otolith chemistries from juveniles and adults to determine if relative concentrations of elements/Ca in scales remained consistent, even if absolute levels were altered. Scale Mn/Ca and Ba/Ca remained correlated with those in otoliths of adult fish. Finally, we examined the ability of elemental signatures in scales to act as natural tags of natal estuaries in spawning weakfish. Allocation of fish to natal estuaries based on geochemical signatures in scales and otoliths from age-1 fish was similar; however, allocation was different for age-2 fish. Elemental signatures in scales degraded after the juvenile period and after maturation were insufficiently stable for use as a natural tag of natal origins in weakfish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".