MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054948537 · doi:10.3917/mav.042.0247

Les entrepreneurs des secteurs technologiques : leur profil, leurs motivations et leurs actions

2011· article· fr· W2054948537 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yvon Gasse

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement & Avenir · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFirm Innovation and Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Plusieurs études ont analysé les profils et les motivations des entrepreneurs; cependant, peu de recherches ont porté sur les innovateurs des domaines technologiques qui décident de créer leur entreprise. Cette étude porte sur la trame entrepreneuriale d’un groupe de 44 innovateurs-entrepreneurs canadiens. On y décrit les antécédents, les principales motivations, les capacités, les attitudes, ainsi que les actions déterminantes de la réussite. Le suivi du démarrage des entreprises opérationnelles nous démontre que ce sont les entrepreneurs qui ont opté pour la familiarité et la simplicité du concept qui ont réussi en moins de deux ans à générer des revenus dans une stratégie de petits pas et de contrôle, même avec des moyens modestes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.235
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.042 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement & AvenirSame topicFirm Innovation and GrowthFrench-language works237,207