Application of Multiphase Dielectric Mixing Models for Understanding the Effective Dielectric Permittivity of Frozen Soils
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The time domain reflectometry (TDR)–measured effective permittivity in frozen soil conditions is affected by many complex factors including bound water effects on soil water permittivity, phase changes, soil microstructure and relative positions of soil constituents with respect to each other. The objective of this study was to improve understanding of some of the factors affecting the effective permittivity of frozen soils through the use of dielectric mixing models. Published datasets and frozen and unfrozen soil data measured on western Canadian soils were investigated with multiphase discrete and confocal ellipsoid models available in the literature. The results revealed that adjusting model parameters allowed the mixing models to describe the frozen soil permittivity equally well when bound water effects and temperature‐dependent water permittivity effects were included or not included. Measurement of freezing and thawing curves on western Canadian soils showed significant hysteresis and some mechanisms for this observed hysteresis and its influence on the interpretation of published datasets are discussed. When independent measurements of liquid water, ice and effective permittivity are available, it is possible to find one set of model parameters that reasonably predict effective permittivity for both frozen and unfrozen conditions. In frozen soils the predictive capability of the models is constrained to scenarios where the initial water content prior to freezing (i.e., the total water content) in the sampling volume is constant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it