MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054968331 · doi:10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.289

Phase portraits, Hopf bifurcations and limit cyclesof Leslie-Gower predator-prey systems with harvesting rates

2010· article· en· W2054968331 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhase portraitHopf bifurcationLimit (mathematics)MathematicsSaddleLimit cycleConstant (computer programming)BifurcationStatistical physicsMathematical analysisPhysicsMathematical optimizationComputer scienceNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamics of Leslie-Gower predator-prey models with constant harvesting ratesare investigated. The ranges of the parameters involved in the systems are given under whichthe equilibria of the systems are positive.The phase portraits near these positive equilibria are studied.It is proved that the positive equilibria on the $x$-axis are saddle-nodes, saddles or unstable nodesdepending on the choices of the parameters involved while the interior positive equilibria in the first quadrantare saddles, stable or unstable nodes, foci, centers, saddle-nodes or cusps.It is shown that there are two saddle-node bifurcations and by computingthe Liapunov numbers and determining its signs, the supercritical or subcritical Hopf bifurcationsand limit cycles for the weak centers are obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it