MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054976678 · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/18/7/003

Simultaneous measurement of acoustic and streaming velocities using synchronized PIV technique

2007· article· en· W2054976678 on OpenAlexafffund
Majid Nabavi, Muhammad Haroon Siddiqui, Javad Dargahi

Bibliographic record

VenueMeasurement Science and Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsParticle image velocimetryAcoustic streamingAcousticsWaveformParticle velocityVelocimetryAmplitudeMeasure (data warehouse)Phase velocityPhysicsAcoustic wavePhase (matter)Acoustic Doppler velocimetryOpticsMechanicsLaser Doppler velocimetryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synchronized particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique has been applied to measure the acoustic and streaming velocity fields simultaneously, inside a standing-wave rectangular channel. In this technique, the velocity fields were sampled at a certain phase of the excitation waveform. The acoustic velocity fields were obtained by cross-correlating the two consecutive PIV images, whereas the streaming velocity fields were obtained by cross-correlating the alternative PIV images at the same phase. The experimental values of the mean acoustic velocity and RMS streaming velocities obtained from PIV are in good agreement with the theoretical values, showing that this novel approach can measure both acoustic and streaming velocities, accurately and simultaneously, in the presence of large amplitude acoustic wave.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeasurement Science and TechnologySame topicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet FlowsFrench-language works237,207