(1<i>R</i>,3<i>S</i>)-Camphoric acid as a building block in supramolecular chemistry: adducts with organic polyamines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(1R,3S)-Camphoric acid [(1R,3S)-1,2,2,-trimethylcyclopentane-1,3-dicarboxylic acid, C(10)H(16)O(4)] forms adducts with a range of amines in which the acid component may be the neutral molecule, the mono-anion (C(10)H(15)O(4))(-) or the di-anion (C(10)H(14)O(4))(2-). The structures generated by the hard hydrogen bonds take the form of chains in the 1:1 adducts (II) and (III) formed with 4,4'-bipyridyl and 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane. There are single sheets in the hydrated 1:1 adduct (IV) formed with 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane, and pairwise-interwoven sheets in the 2:1 adduct (V) formed with hexamethylenetetramine. Three-dimensional frameworks are present in the salt-like 1:1 adduct (VI) formed with piperazine and in the hydrated 3:1 adduct (VII) formed with N,N'-dimethylpiperazine. This latter adduct contains both neutral C(10)H(16)O(4) and anionic (C(10)H(15)O(4))(-) units. In (II), (III) and (IV), the chain and sheet substructures are linked by C-H...O hydrogen bonds to form three-dimensional frameworks. The monoclinic polymorph of camphoric acid itself (I) has been reinvestigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".