Kinetics study on cnt‐supported RuKCo FTS catalyst in a fixed bed reactor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The rate of syngas (H 2 /CO) consumption over a RuKCo/CNT Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) catalyst was measured in a fixed bed microreactor at 210–225°C, 2–3.5 MPa, H 2 /CO feed molar ratios of 1–2.5, and gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) range of 2700–3600 h −1 . The data have been used to model the kinetics of the FTS reactions within the range of the studied conditions. One empirical power law model and four semi‐empirical kinetic models based on Langmuir–Hinshelwood‐type equation have been evaluated. The best fitting was obtained with the equation: similar to that proposed by Brötz et al. The estimated activation energy ( E = 80–85 kJ/mol) is lower than that is reported in the literature. The validity of these results are restricted to fixed beds with the given catalyst in the tested conversion regime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".