MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055028833 · doi:10.2136/vzj2009.0070

Advective and Diffusive Gas Transport through Fractured Sulfur Blocks

2010· article· en· W2055028833 on OpenAlexafffund
Tyler K. Birkham, M. Jim Hendry, S. Lee Barbour

Bibliographic record

VenueVadose Zone Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAdvectionDiffusionTRACERBlock (permutation group theory)SulfurGroundwaterChemistryPorosityMineralogyHydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryGeologyGeometryThermodynamicsGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long‐term storage of S 0 blocks poses a contamination risk to both groundwater and surface water as the oxidation of S 0 to H 2 SO 4 creates drainage waters with low pH and elevated SO 4 2− concentrations. Because the presence of O 2 in the S 0 blocks is a primary control on S 0 oxidation, rates of atmospheric gas migration into the blocks can be used to quantify S 0 oxidation rates. Using in situ measurements and a tracer experiment combined with laboratory diffusion experiments, we determined that transport analysis of multiple gas species is required to quantify O 2 fluxes into a S 0 block. Advection, created by O 2 consumption within the block, accounted for 21% of the total O 2 influx and considerably increased H 2 SO 4 production in the block above that attributed to O 2 diffusion. While barometric pumping of the fracture porosity in the upper 8 m was probably occurring, its overall effect on O 2 influx was determined to be negligible. Quantification of O 2 and CO 2 fluxes was necessary to explain the direction and magnitude of N 2 concentration gradients that develop in the block, despite the fact that N 2 was nonreactive. Our findings should be widely applicable because the construction method of S 0 blocks is standard throughout the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVadose Zone JournalSame topicGroundwater flow and contamination studiesFrench-language works237,207