Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article aborde l’inscription matérielle de la mémoire des arts traditionnels et modernes au sein de créations contemporaines. Certaines d’entre elles nouent en effet un rapport fertile avec des oeuvres fondatrices de l’histoire de l’art. Ce dialogue prend la forme d’une reprise de l’original, lequel va être déplacé ou replacé au sein de nouveaux agencements de matière, constitués par les dispositifs visuels et/ou scéniques qui nous sont contemporains. Cette reprise est différente du recyclage postmoderne, car elle est dialogique au sens fort du terme. L’analyse se développe autour de trois études de cas : celle de l’oeuvre-installation intitulée Uraniborg de l’artiste français Laurent Grasso (Musée d’art contemporain de Montréal, 2013), qui offre un excellent exemple de coexistence des arts et des temporalités; ensuite, une ouverture est faite sur l’installation scénoacoustique Stifters Dinge de Heiner Goebbels (Avignon, 2008); enfin, le dernier cas étudié est Gob Squad’s Kitchen du groupe Gob Squad (Usine C, 2013), qui s’appuie sur le film Kitchen de Warhol pour proposer une expérience théâtrale revisitant autrement l’avant-garde américaine moderne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".