Bibliographic record
Abstract
En octobre 2005, invité à mener une recherche exploratoire sur le patrimoine religieux acadien de la baie Sainte-Marie en Nouvelle-Écosse, l’auteur a choisi de se laisser guider par les traces du religieux dans le paysage, afin de voir si le patrimoine de cette région est différent de celui qui existe ailleurs dans la francophonie canadienne et, d’autre part, s’il est en continuité ou en rupture par rapport à l’Acadie de la Nouvelle-France ou à la France elle-même, dont il serait issu. Parmi les nombreuses observations que ces questions suscitent, il en retient deux. L’une montre qu’il y a eu rupture : comment expliquer qu’il n’existe pas ici de croix de chemins, pourtant partout présentes dans la francophonie canadienne? L’autre fait plutôt état de continuité : il s’agit de la dévotion au Sacré-Coeur dont l’iconographie, présente notamment dans les églises paroissiales tenues par les eudistes, remonte au xviie siècle français.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".