The case for treatment of dyspeptic patients infected with H. pylori
Bibliographic record
Abstract
H. pylori is probably the commonest bacterial infection worldwide and associated with a number of clinical outcomes including chronic active gastritis, peptic ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma, gastric MALT lymphoma and possibly dyspepsia. Treatment to eradicate H. pylori infection has changed significantly the natural history of peptic ulcer disease and is now the recommended approach to patients with non-NSAID gastric and duodenal ulcers. Controversies remain as to whether H. pylori infection is a cause of dyspepsia and non-ulcer dyspepsia. However, results from several economic models evaluating a "test and treat" strategy have suggested that eradication of H. pylori infection as an initial choice is the most cost-effective approach and has a long-term benefit in a significant proportion of patients with dyspepsia. The conclusion of H. pylori as a group 1 human carcinogen by the IARC and the subsequent analyses have added further to the recommendation for eradication of the infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".