MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A global survey of the role of ultraviolet radiation and hormonal influences in the development of melasma

2009· article· en· W2055136319 on OpenAlexaff
Ortonne Jp, I. Reig Rincón de Arellano, Mark Berneburg, Tânia Ferreira Cestari, Henry H. Chan, Pearl E. Grimes, Dóris Hexsel, Sin‐Hyeog Im, Junwoo Lim, Lui H, Amit G. Pandya, Mauro Picardo, Marta I. Rendon, Susan C. Taylor, JPW Van Der Veen, W. Westerhof

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatologic Treatments and Research
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
FundersGalderma
KeywordsMelasmaMedicinePregnancyFamily historyDermatologyPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: It has been generally believed that the four main causes of melasma are pregnancy, hormonal contraception, family history and sun exposure; however, there are few published comprehensive studies that confirm these assertions. The Pigmentary Disorders Academy - an international group of experts in pigmentary disorders - designed and conducted a global survey of women to investigate the effect of these factors on onset and chronicity of melasma and the course of the disease in order to gain a better understanding of the causative factors associated with this disorder, with a particular focus on hormonal factors and UV exposure in females. METHODS: A 40-item largely self-administered questionnaire was completed by 324 women being treated for melasma in nine clinics worldwide. RESULTS: The mean age at onset of melasma was 34 years, and 48% of subjects questioned had a family history of melasma (97% in a first-degree relative). Subjects with family history of melasma tended to have darker skin (90% types III-VI) compared to those without (77% types III-VI). The most common time of onset was after pregnancy (42%), often years after the last pregnancy, with 29% appearing pre-pregnancy and 26% during pregnancy. Onset was related to darker skin type post-pregnancy (P = 0.002). Risk of onset during pregnancy was associated with having spent more time outdoors (an extra 10 h per week spent working outside increases the odds of onset of melasma during pregnancy by approximately 27%) and an increased maternal age at pregnancy (increased by approximately 8% for each year of age at first pregnancy; P = 0.02). The odds of melasma occurring for the first time during a pregnancy were also increased with multiple pregnancies (twice the odds if 2 vs. 1 pregnancies, three times higher if 3 or more vs. 1 pregnancy). Of the women, 25% who had used hormonal contraception claimed that melasma appeared for the first time after its use, the rate being higher for those without vs. with a family history. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that, whilst accepted causes do affect onset of melasma, a combination of these factors often triggers this disorder. These factors may provide further insights into how physicians can manage individual melasma cases, support recommendation of preventative measures and even anticipate treatment results and recurrence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations270
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and VenereologySame topicDermatologic Treatments and ResearchFrench-language works237,207