MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055163402 · doi:10.1093/jrs/fer025

The Divergent Experiences of Children and Adults in the Relocation Process: Perspectives of Child and Parent Refugee Claimants in Montreal

2011· article· en· W2055163402 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gillian Morantz, Cécile Rousseau, Jody Heymann

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Refugee Studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeRelocationSociologyGender studiesMedia studiesLibrary sciencePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In addition to difficult pre-migratory experiences, the migration process also results in challenging socio-economic conditions for most refugee claimants. This study reports on in-depth interviews conducted with refugee claimant children and their parents at a paediatric hospital in Montreal, Canada. A dyadic analysis of their responses reveals that children and adult refugee claimants encounter disparate migratory experiences and live the relocation process differently. Most children, particularly younger ones, undergo the separation from their home countries more easily and experience fewer barriers to social network rebuilding. This results in an easier adaptation to their host society. Nevertheless, they remain at risk because of the difficulties experienced by their parents. Implications for policy and services are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.320
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Refugee StudiesSame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207