MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055181549 · doi:10.1002/etc.5620190919

Effects of pesticide spraying on chick growth, behavior, and parental care in tree swallows (<i>Tachycineta bicolor</i>) nesting in an apple orchard in Ontario, Canada

2000· article· en· W2055181549 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christine A. Bishop, Peggy Ng, Pierre Mineau, James S. Quinn, John Struger

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect and Pesticide Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityYork UniversityEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrchardPaternal careNesting (process)BiologyPesticideApple treeEcologyZoologyToxicologyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The objective of this study was to investigate the consequences of the use of cholinesterase (ChE)-inhibiting insecticides in an apple orchard on behavior and growth of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor). In a sprayed apple orchard and two nonsprayed sites in southern Ontario, Canada, in 1996 through 1997, hunger signaling and growth of chicks, feeding activities of adults, and aerial invertebrate abundance were studied before and after insecticide spray events. In the orchard, persistent and significant increases occurred in hunger signaling by tree swallow chicks after organophosphorus (OP) insecticide spray events in both years and, after a second OP insecticide spray in 1996, significant decreases occurred in the number of feeding trips by parent birds. These trends did not occur in the control sites. After spray events in the orchard, the trends in feeding sorties of adult birds during chick-rearing did not coincide with known experimental responses in tree swallows subjected to reduced food resources. However, trends were consistent with those predicted to occur in adult passerines exposed to ChE-inhibiting insecticides. In contrast, the increased hunger signaling by chicks may reflect chronically low food resources available in the orchard but does not indicate ChE depression. Few differences were found among sites in the size and type of aerial invertebrates caught in traps. Very low densities of invertebrates occurred in the orchard relative to the other locations but the abundance did not vary significantly with insecticide events. Despite changes in avian behaviors associated with insecticide sprays, differences in masses of chicks among sites and after spray events were not related to insecticide use in the orchard. Because first-year survival of tree swallow chicks is correlated with their mass at fledging, this suggests a need to maintain relatively natural habitats with abundant food resources near sprayed agricultural areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.809

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Toxicology and ChemistrySame topicInsect and Pesticide ResearchFrench-language works237,207