L’eurythmie paradoxale : la métaphore de la danseuse comme allégorie esthétique chez Baudelaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous prenons comme point de départ le flux rythmique d'un cosmos organique caractérisé par ce que Friedrich Schlegel appelle son agilité éternelle. Conformément à cette doctrine métaphysique, l'ironie romantique articule le moment funambulesque où l'objet esthétique vacille entre l'autocréation et l'autodestruction. Cette étude examinera l'application de la théorie de l'ironie romantique à l'esthétique baudelairienne, notamment dans la danse cosmique de la « vibrativité » organique telle qu'elle apparaît dans « la grande symphonie du jour » (« De la couleur », Salon de 1846), ainsi que dans l'architecture cinétique de « la Fanfarlo ». La métaphore de la danseuse, avec son eurythmie paradoxale, doit se comprendre en fin de compte comme le répondant allégorique du texte cinétique qui ne peut s'affirmer que dans son auto-anéantissement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".