MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055198680 · doi:10.1049/ip-com:20050142

Mobile positioning based on relaying capability of mobile stations in hybrid wireless networks

2006· article· en· W2055198680 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Communications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkMobile wirelessMobile ad hoc networkFlooding (psychology)Scheme (mathematics)WirelessCellular networkWireless networkReal-time computingTelecommunicationsNetwork packet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel mobile position location procedure, based on the relaying capability of the mobile stations in a hybrid cellular/peer-to-peer ad hoc network to improve positioning coverage and accuracy, is proposed. The proposed mobile location scheme is a hierarchical-structured flooding procedure, making use of the relaying capability of mobile stations to achieve location diversity. Simulation results show that the proposed positioning scheme offers improvement in coverage and accuracy compared to conventional positioning methods reported in the literature. With the increase of the mobiles in the system, the coverage of the conventional system does not change. However, the coverage of the proposed discovery mechanism monotonically increases towards 100% by exploiting location diversity. The gain of the coverage is also promising when cell size is large, where the conventional methods suffer the hearability problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.687

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it