MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055214645 · doi:10.1063/1.4807039

Second harmonic effect on geodesic modes in tokamak plasmas

2013· article· en· W2055214645 on OpenAlexaff
A. G. Elfimov, A. I. Smolyakov, A. V. Melnikov, R. M. O. Galvão

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Plasmas · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHarmonicsTokamakGeodesicHarmonicLandau dampingPlasmaHarmonic numberMagnetic fieldOrbit (dynamics)Quantum electrodynamicsMode (computer interface)IonNormal modeKinetic energyComputational physicsAtomic physicsClassical mechanicsAcousticsQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysisVibrationVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Results of a kinetic treatment of Geodesic Acoustic Modes (GAMs) that fully takes into account ion parallel dynamics, including the magnetic field component, are presented. The finite-orbit-width (FOW) parameter is considered in the calculation of the second harmonic effect on GAMs. For larger values of the FOW parameter, it is shown that dispersive effects related to the m = 2 harmonics is the cause of the mode frequency splitting and the modes appear due to the interaction with the ion sound mode. Furthermore, the modes may have enhanced damping rates due to second harmonic Landau damping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.946

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of PlasmasSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207