The Rho5 GTPase is necessary for oxidant-induced cell death in budding yeast
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In both animal and yeast cells, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced as byproducts of metabolism and upon exposure to diverse environmental stresses. Cellular defense systems operate to avoid molecular damage caused by ROS, but the redox balance is disturbed under excessive stress. Cells of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergo apoptotic-like cell death upon exposure to hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)). Here, we report that the Rho5 GTPase of budding yeast is necessary for H(2)O(2)-induced cell death, which accompanies ROS accumulation and DNA fragmentation. Unlike WT, a rho5 deletion mutant (rho5Delta) exhibits little cell death, whereas the constitutively active rho5(G12V) mutant exhibits excess ROS accumulation and increased cell death upon H(2)O(2) treatment. Consistent with a role in the oxidative stress response, Rho5 interacts with the thioredoxin reductase Trr1, a key component of the cytoplasmic thioredoxin antioxidant system, in a GTP-dependent manner. This interaction occurs on the vacuolar membrane before exposure to H(2)O(2) but also in the vacuolar lumen after H(2)O(2) treatment. Trr1 levels are elevated in rho5Delta cells but are elevated only slightly in WT and not in the rho5(G12V) cells after H(2)O(2) treatment. Taken together, these data suggest that Rho5 mediates H(2)O(2)-induced cell death by regulating the level of Trr1 or by excluding Trr1 from its cytoplasmic substrate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".