MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055272564 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2001-022-0

Isometric Dilations of Non-Commuting Finite Rank <i>n</i>-Tuples

2001· article· en· W2055272564 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsSection (typography)Pure mathematicsTupleUnitary stateRank (graph theory)Algebra over a fieldCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A contractive n -tuple A = ( A 1,…, A n ) has a minimal joint isometric dilation S = ( S 1 ,…, S n ) where the S i ’s are isometries with pairwise orthogonal ranges. This determines a representation of the Cuntz-Toeplitz algebra. When A acts on a finite dimensional space, the wot-closed nonself-adjoint algebra generated by S is completely described in terms of the properties of A . This provides complete unitary invariants for the corresponding representations. In addition, we show that the algebra is always hyper-reflexive. In the last section, we describe similarity invariants. In particular, an n -tuple B of d × d matrices is similar to an irreducible n -tuple A if and only if a certain finite set of polynomials vanish on B .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it