MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055284242 · doi:10.1159/000353371

Challenging Question: Is Treating Inflammatory Bowel Disease an Art or Strictly an Evidence-Based Matter?

2013· review· en· W2055284242 on OpenAlexaff
Reena Khanna, Mahmoud Mosli, Brian G. Feagan

Bibliographic record

VenueDigestive Diseases · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseEvidence-based medicineRandomized controlled trialAlternative medicineCrohn's diseaseIntensive care medicineMEDLINEInflammatory Bowel DiseasesHealth careClinical PracticeGold standard (test)DiseaseFamily medicineSurgeryInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the gold standard for clinical practice, misconceptions among health care providers regarding EBM are common. The medical management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) has advanced substantially over the last 20 years as a direct result of the wealth of new evidence generated by randomized controlled trials. Integrating EBM and traditional clinical skills results in optimal care tailored to the individual patient. This article addresses the role of EBM in the management of IBD and dispels some of the common misconceptions about the use of EBM in practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigestive DiseasesSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207