MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055294280 · doi:10.1139/p07-094

About the simulation of primary grown-in microdefects in dislocation-free silicon single-crystal formation

2007· article· en· W2055294280 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
V. I. Talanin, I. E. Talanin, A. A. Voronin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolidification and crystal growth phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSiliconPhysicsDislocationDiffusionCrystallizationSingle crystalCrystal (programming language)CrystallographyVacancy defectChemical physicsMolecular physicsCarbon fibersOxygenCondensed matter physicsThermodynamicsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsComposite materialChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mathematical model of primary grown-in microdefects formation is proposed. The model is built on the basis of the dissociative process of diffusion. Here, we study the interaction patterns between oxygen-vacancy (O + V) and carbon-interstitial (C + I) near the crystallization front in dislocation-free silicon monocrystals grown by float-zone and Czochralski methods. As shown here, the approximate analysis formulas obtained tally with the heterogeneous mechanism of grown-in microdefects formation. PACS Nos.: 61.72Bb, 61.72.Jj, 61.72.Yx

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicSolidification and crystal growth phenomenaFrench-language works237,207