MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055354488 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.095006

Simulated annealing for generalized Skyrme models

2005· article· en· W2055354488 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSimulated annealingAnnealing (glass)Statistical physicsEconometricsEnvironmental sciencePhysicsMathematical optimizationMathematicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use a simulated annealing algorithm to find the static field configuration with the lowest energy in a given sector of topological charge for generalized $SU(2)$ Skyrme models. These numerical results suggest that the following conjecture may hold: the symmetries of the soliton solutions of extended Skyrme models are the same as for the Skyrme model. Indeed, this is verified for two effective Lagrangians with terms of order six and order eight in derivatives of the pion fields, respectively, for topological charges $B=1$ up to $B=4$. We also evaluate the energy of these multiskyrmions using the rational maps ansatz. A comparison with the exact numerical results shows that the reliability of this approximation for extended Skyrme models is almost as good as for the pure Skyrme model. Some details regarding the implementation of the simulated annealing algorithm in one and three spatial dimensions are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it