L'preuve parisienne: le cas d'Albertine, en cinq temps de Michel Tremblay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Theatre as a public art has a major role in the affirmation, interrogation and confirmation of community and national identity, and nowhere more so than in minority societies. In Quebec, the need for a specifically Qubcois theatre, distinct from that of France, was first publicly recognized in Gratien Glinas's vision Pour un thtre national populaire (1949) and decisively taken forward subsequently by Michel Tremblay in his first major play Les Belles-surs (1968). But reinforcement of community and nation from within leads on to the ambition of recognition of community or national profile from without, particularly in Quebec's case recognition from France. The 1988 performance and reception in Paris of Albertine, en cinq temps (1984a), probably the most highly acclaimed of Tremblay's plays after Les Belles-surs , highlights some of the difficulties of this ambition, and raises questions as to the extent to which particular and universal values can be successfully transposed and shared between two related, and yet distant and distinctive, environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".