MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

THE IMPACT OF SUPPORT GROUPS ON THE PSYCHOLOGICAL STATE OF ATHLETES EXPERIENCING CONCCUSSIONS

2002· article· en· W2055385079 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPhysical Education and Training Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAthletesPsychologyState (computer science)Physical medicine and rehabilitationClinical psychologyPhysical therapyComputer scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years there has been considerable interest and research examining the psychological effects of athletic injuries, as well as coping strategies for an enhanced recovery. Theoretical and empirical investigations have determined that reaction to athletic injury may result in psychological distress (Gould, Udry, Bridges & Beck, 1997). Athletic injuries, especially concussions, have been increasing at an alarming rate with as many as 300,000 reported concussions occuring each year in the United States (Johnston, Lassonde & Ptito, 2001). PURPOSE: To examine the psychological effects of sport related concussions and to determine if athletes participating in support groups can reduce these psychological side effects. METHODS: Subjects included two groups of concussed male and female varsity or comparable elite level athletes representing either a control or an experimental group. All subjects completed the Profile of Mood States (POMS) (McNair, Lorr, & Droppleman, 1971) rating their mood disturbance, and the Post Concussion Rating Scale, pre and post-intervention. The participants in the experimental group participated in three support group intervention sessions, lasting approximately 45 minutes. Each session began with a 15-minute educational seminar on topics that included psychological response to injury, concussions, and fear of re-injury and return to sport. Each session concluded with a 30-minute discussion surrounding the topic that was presented to the athletes. Subjects in the control group completed the same measurement instruments and received no intervention. RESULTS: Data were analyzed using a series of dependent and independent t-tests to determine if social support groups had an effect on the psychological state of concussed athletes. Similarities and differences between the groups will be described. CONCLUSION: Implementation of intervention techniques for concussed athletes offers potential benefit for recovery as well as practical information for athletes, coaches, sport medicine practitioners, and sport psychologists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it