Le développement territorial entre sociologie des territoires et science régionale : la voix du GRIDEQ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire sur le développement régional, de l’Est du Québec (GRIDEQ) illustre l’une des lignes de transformation des sciences sociales québécoises : initialement proche de la discipline sociologique, il s’est progressivement rapproché de la science régionale en proposant une analyse sociale et interdisciplinaire des territoires au Québec. Il a développé dans cette trajectoire un intérêt spécifique pour la place de l’action collective au sein des structures territoriales, une tension qui, initialement inconfortable, donne lieu depuis les années 1990 à un regain intellectuel autour d’une conception constructiviste et dynamique du territoire, où les individus et les groupes sociaux restent les moteurs essentiels. Dans le cadre d’une nouvelle économie politique, leurs mobilisations ouvrent à envisager les territoires comme construits par des mouvements communautaires et sociaux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".