MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055399757 · doi:10.5235/1460728x.1.1.73

The Not Now Habit: Procrastination, Legal Ethics and Legal Education

2013· article· en· W2055399757 on OpenAlexaff
Annalise Acorn, Jason Buttuls

Bibliographic record

VenueLegal Ethics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNothingHabitLawProcrastinationLegal ethicsPsychologySociologyPhilosophyPolitical scienceSocial psychologyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A young lawyer arrives at a restaurant to meet some of his fellow practitioners for lunch. His friends haven't seen him in a while and so they are surprised to observe that his hair is unusually long and unkempt. 'What's with the hair?' they ask. The young lawyer replies: 'Oh that. Well, I'm representing my barber on a personal injury matter. But haven't done a thing on the file in months. If I go see him to get my haircut he'll ask me what's going on with his case and I'll have to admit I've done nothing. And I can't get my hair cut anywhere else because he's been my barber for years. I couldn't do that to him.'

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLegal EthicsSame topicPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesFrench-language works237,207