MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055425693 · doi:10.1139/l07-136

Application of lean thinking to improve the productivity of water and sewer service installations

2008· article· en· W2055425693 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Dale Kung, Dinu Philip Alex, Mohamed Al‐Hussein, Siri Fernando

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicQuality and Supply Management
Canadian institutionsCanadian Chiropractic AssociationVanguard CollegeCanadian Natural Resources
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProductivityService (business)Metropolitan areaTransport engineeringLean constructionEngineeringWorkflowQueueing theoryConstruction engineeringComputer scienceBusinessConstruction industry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The installation of water and sewer services is an essential element of many construction projects. With an increasing number of construction projects being undertaken in metropolitan areas, delays are no longer affordable. To increase productivity in this type of construction project, workflow must be improved. This paper describes the application of lean thinking principles to improve the productivity of water and sewer service installations. To illustrate this, a case study is presented that applies these principles to water and sewer service installations performed by City of Edmonton construction crews. As well, this paper outlines a study that applies the lean thinking procedures recommended within a queuing theory model to validate the effect of the proposed improvements to productivity. Potential improvements to overall productivity will be discussed along with proposed future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicQuality and Supply ManagementFrench-language works237,207