MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055426507 · doi:10.1117/12.386870

<title>Packaging of an optoelectronic-VLSI chip supporting a 32 X 32 array of surface-active devices</title>

2000· article· en· W2055426507 on OpenAlexaff
Michael H. Ayliffe, D.R. Rolston, E. L. Chuah, Éric Bernier, Feras S. J. Michael, D. Kabal, Andrew G. Kirk, David V. Plant

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)McGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChipHeat sinkMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsBall grid arrayFlip chipPrinted circuit boardElectronic packagingVery-large-scale integrationChip-scale packageThermoelectric coolingIntegrated circuit packagingWire bondingThermal resistanceSurface-mount technologyPackaging engineeringSolderingElectrical engineeringIntegrated circuitThermoelectric effectNanotechnologyEngineeringMechanical engineeringThermalWaferPhysicsComposite materialLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Innovative approaches to the packaging of a high-performance module accommodating a 32 X 32 array of surface-active devices indium bump bonded to a 9 X 9 mm<SUP>2</SUP> VLSI chip are described. The module integrates a mini-lens array, a copper heat spreader, a thermoelectric cooler and an aluminum heatsink. The mini-lens array is aligned and packaged with the chip using a novel six degrees of freedom alignment technique. The module is compact (44 X 44 X 45 mm<SUP>3</SUP>), easy to assemble and can be passively removed and inserted into a free-space optical system with no need for further adjustments. The chip is mounted directly on a flexible printed-circuit board using a chip-on-board approach, providing 207 bond pad connections to the chip. The junction-to-TEC thermal resistance is only 0.4 degree(s)C/W.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.939

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicElectronic Packaging and Soldering TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207