MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Identification and molecular characterization of the blueberry stunt phytoplasma in Canada

2015· article· en· W2055433959 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yaima Arocha Rosete, Annemiek C. Schilder, Liette Lambert, James A. Scott

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytopathogenic Mollicutes · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)PhytoplasmaBiologyTraditional medicineBiotechnologyBotanyMedicineGeneticsPolymerase chain reactionRestriction fragment length polymorphismGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blueberry farms in Quebec, Canada, were recently surveyed for phytoplasma-associated disease presence. Farmers previously reported a number of high bush blueberries showing stunt symptoms in three blueberry farms. Bushes were tested for phytoplasma based on the 16S rRNA gene. Nested PCR with universal phytoplasma primers resulted in amplification of phytoplasma DNA from blueberry bushes in samples from two of the farms surveyed. The 16S rDNA of the blueberry stunt phytoplasma from Quebec showed a 99% sequence identity with that of the blueberry stunt phytoplasma from Michigan (AY265220) from group 16SrI ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris’ subgroup 16SrI-E. Phylogeny results confirmed the clustering of the blueberry stunt phytoplasma from Quebec within the same phylogenetic branch of phytoplasmas of group 16SrI, closely related to subgroup 16SrI-E. Preliminary virtual RFLP confirmed the sequence and phylogeny classification results. Further actual and virtual analyses are in progress to verify the presence of other possible phytoplasma strains from the Quebec blueberry farms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytopathogenic MollicutesSame topicPhytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogensFrench-language works237,207