MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055438568 · doi:10.1142/s0217751x02010674

A VARIATIONAL FOCK-SPACE TREATMENT OF QUARKONIUM

2002· article· en· W2055438568 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics A · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarkoniumDecoupling (probability)Formalism (music)GluonQuantum chromodynamicsHamiltonian (control theory)QuarkQuark–gluon plasmaPosition and momentum space

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The variational method and the Hamiltonian formalism of QCD are used to derive relativistic, momentum space integral equations for a quark–antiquark system with an arbitrary number of gluons present. As a first step, the resulting infinite chain of coupled equations is solved in the nonrelativistic limit by an approximate decoupling method. Comparison with experiment allows us to fix the quark mass and coupling constant, allowing for the calculation of the spectra of massive systems such as charmonium and bottomonium. Studying the results with and without the non-Abelian terms, we find that the presence of the non-Abelian factors yields better agreement with the experimental spectra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics ASame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207