MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055448431 · doi:10.1002/dvg.20749

Development of transgenic mice expressing a conditionally active form of the eIF2α kinase PKR

2011· article· en· W2055448431 on OpenAlexafffund
Andreas I. Papadakis, Dionissios Baltzis, Ryan C. Buensuceso, Philippos Peidis, Antonis E. Koromilas

Bibliographic record

Venuegenesis · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA regulation and disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPhosphorylationProtein kinase RIntegrated stress responseBiologyCell biologyeIF2KinaseProtein kinase domainEIF-2 kinaseProtein kinase ATranslation (biology)Cyclin-dependent kinase 2BiochemistryMutantMessenger RNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phosphorylation of the alpha (α) subunit of the eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2) at serine 51 is an important mechanism of translational control in response to various forms of environmental stress. In metazoans, eIF2α phosphorylation is mediated by four kinases each of which becomes activated by distinct stimuli. Previous work established that expression of a chimera protein comprising of the bacteria Gyrase B N-terminal (GyrB) domain fused to the kinase domain (KD) of the eIF2α kinase PKR is capable of inducing eIF2α phosphorylation in cultured cells after treatment with the antibiotic coumermycin. Herein, we report the development of transgenic mice expressing the fusion protein GyrB.PKR ubiquitously. Treatment of mice with coumermycin induces eIF2α phosphorylation in vivo as demonstrated by immunoblotting and immunoshistochemistry of mouse tissues. The GyrB.PKR transgene represents a useful model system to investigate the biological effects of the conditional induction of eIF2α phosphorylation in vivo in the absence of parallel signaling pathways that are elicited in response to stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuegenesisSame topicRNA regulation and diseaseFrench-language works237,207