P wave velocities, anisotropy and hysteresis in ultrahigh‐pressure metamorphic rocks as a function of confining pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Chinese Continental Drilling Project (CCSD) has drilled to a depth of 5100 m at Maobei (N34.40, E118.67), Donghai County, Jiangsu Province in the eastern segment of the Dabie‐Sulu ultrahigh pressure (UHP) metamorphic terrane. The borehole, which penetrated through all of the high velocity layers and seismic reflectors observed within the uppermost crust on seismic refraction and reflection profiles, reveals the main lithologies to be coesite‐bearing felsic gneisses, metabasic rocks (i.e., amphibolite, retrogressed, and non‐retrogressed eclogites) and ultramafic rocks (i.e., garnet peridotite and serpentinite). P wave velocities, anisotropy, and hysteresis of 31 typical CCSD core samples and 35 representative surface samples collected from the Sulu UHP belt were measured at hydrostatic confining pressures up to 800 MPa. The velocity‐pressure curves can be well described by a four‐parameter exponential equation derived from theory: V ( P ) = V 0 + DP − B 0 exp(− kP ), where V 0 is the projected velocity at zero pressure if pores/cracks were absent; D is the intrinsic pressure derivative of velocity in the linear elastic regime; B 0 is the initial velocity drop caused by the presence of pores/cracks at zero pressure; and k is the decay constant of the velocity drop in the nonlinear poro‐elastic regime. The seismic hysteresis is caused by irreversible changes in grain contact, increases in microcrack aspect ratios and reduction of void space during the pressurization‐depressurization cycle. The statistical properties of P wave velocities in the UHP rocks provide an important set of basic information for the interpretation of field seismic data from the root zones of continental convergent orogenic belts and modern and ancient subduction zones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".