MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2055483275 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2012.0010

Wilde Pedagogy: Digitized Resources and Gender Analysis of Periodical Visuality

2012· article· en· W2055483275 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Linda K. Hughes

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecadenceRelation (database)AestheticismSociologyVisual artsAestheticsArtLiteratureComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay describes an assignment asking students enrolled in "Wilde Years: Oscar Wilde and the 1890s" to locate a cartoon or image in Punch , the Yellow Book, or Savoy and analyze this visual image in relation to the discourses of gender, aestheticism, and/or decadence. In addition, based upon a survey of student practices and attitudes involved in the assignment, this essay considers the impact of newly-available digitized archives on pedagogy. Not surprisingly, students favored searching for material online rather than using hard copies in the library, but they also reported challenges in searching for images. The essay concludes by considering the relation between digital resources and the quality of students' completed work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207