Method for Measuring Carbon Kinetic Isotope Effects of Gas-Phase Reactions of Light Hydrocarbons with the Hydroxyl Radical
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A technique for the accurate measurement of the carbon kinetic isotope effects (KIEs) of the reactions of light non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC) with OH radicals in the gas phase is presented. The method uses a variant of established relative rate techniques, which has been optimized for measurements of KIEs. The instrumentation consists of three basic components: (1) a gas-phase reaction chamber, (2) a gas chromatograph (GC) for separating the components of the reaction mixture, and (3) an isotope ratio mass spectrometer coupled on-line to the GC. Using this technique, measurements of hydroxyl radical reaction KIEs with C 2 −C 9 saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons having rate constants between 10 -11 and 10 -13 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 are achievable. This method has been used successfully to measure the carbon KIE for the reactions of OH with a wide range of hydrocarbons in the gas phase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".