Clinical Features, Management, and Outcome of Children With Fetal and Postnatal Diagnoses of Isomerism Syndromes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Isomerism is associated with a complex spectrum of anomalies. There is paucity of data on prenatally detected cases. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 1990 and February 2004, 83 of 166 cases (50%) had a prenatal diagnosis of left isomerism (LAI; 52 of 97) or right isomerism (RAI; 31 of 69) at our institution. The spectrum of anomalies, management, and outcomes was compared for fetal and postnatal diagnoses of LAI and RAI. RAI more often than LAI was associated with AV septal defect (90% versus 56%; P<0.0001), pulmonary outflow obstruction (91% versus 37%; P<0.0001), total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage (73% versus 13%; P<0.0001), and abnormal VA connections (68% versus 33%; P<0.0001), whereas inferior vena cava interruption (3% versus 93%; P<0.0001), complete AV block (0% versus 13%; P=0.004), aortic obstruction (6% versus 33%; P<0.0001), and extracardiac defects (5% versus 25%; P=0.006) were less common. The spectrum of lesions was comparable for fetal and postnatal cases, except for AV block (fetal, 25%; postnatal, 0%; P=0.0002) and AV septal defect (fetal, 67%; postnatal, 42%; P=0.023) in LAI. Fetal demise was due mainly to pregnancy termination (LAI, 42%; RAI, 45%). Survival of actively managed children with LAI was significantly better than for those with RAI (P<0.0001) but did not differ with regard to fetal versus postnatal diagnosis. Most LAI cases required no intervention or underwent successful biventricular cardiac surgery (65%), unlike RAI cases (13%; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal diagnosis did not affect overall survival despite facilitated care. The prognosis of RAI was worse compared with LAI because of more complex associated cardiac defects and the inability to perform successful surgical procedures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".