Prompt Improvement of Left Ventricular Function and Preservation of Topography with Combined Reperfusion and Intravenous Nitroglycerin in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reperfusion alone during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) preserves left ventricular (LV) topography but causes 'stunning', with delayed or no recovery of function. To determine whether adjunctive intravenous nitroglycerin (NTG) accelerates functional recovery, we prospectively measured function and topography by repeated two-dimensional echocardiography between 1 day and 6 months in 5 groups of patients (n = 73) with a first AMI: placebo (group 1), NTG alone (group 2), NTG combined with successful reperfusion after 4 h (group 3) or failed reperfusion (group 4), and successful reperfusion alone (group 5). Asynergy decreased promptly (p < 0.001) and ejection fraction improved (p < 0.001) between day 1 and 6 months in groups 2 and 3 compared to baseline and groups 1, 4 and 5. Infarct expansion and thinning found in group 1 were prevented in groups 2, 3, 4 and 5. Diastolic volume increased in the anterior subgroup 1 but not 2, 3, 4 and 5. This is the first demonstration that reperfusion combined with adjunctive NTG produces earlier, greater and persistent recovery of LV function in addition to attenuation of remodeling in patients after AMI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".